v2 exp(d): 5-policy routing under tracets vs thinktime — ranking flip

Extends exp(c) (dispatch ablation, 1 round-robin policy) to the full 5-policy
routing comparison, both modes on the SAME ttp trace (807 reqs, fresh vLLM/arm,
dash0 8xH20). Confirms exp(c)'s prediction and finds something stronger: the
dispatch mode FLIPS which policy wins.

- thinktime helps every policy but helps LPWL most (TTFT p90 -40%, E2E mean -31%
  vs -3..-16% for the rest): tracets bursts punish prefill-spreading.
- Ranking flip: tracets -> LPWL only ties unified_ab on TTFT p90 and is 3rd on
  E2E mean; thinktime -> LPWL is 1st on both (TTFT p90 -31%, best TPOT/balance,
  zero knobs) vs the tuned unified+A+B.
- => benchmark agentic routing with thinktime; tracets' burst artifact erases
  LPWL's advantage. Caveat n=1: tracets ranking is run-sensitive (does not
  reproduce dash1 lpwl_5policy_600s.md), the thinktime advantage is the robust
  signal (appears in both environments).

README + grouped-bar fig (figs/exp_d_policy_dispatch.png) + bench_report
summaries in results/.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-05-30 20:59:18 +08:00
parent 68f21bef23
commit 9b6091fe6e
5 changed files with 1788 additions and 0 deletions

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 81 KiB