v2 exp(d): 5-policy routing under tracets vs thinktime — ranking flip
Extends exp(c) (dispatch ablation, 1 round-robin policy) to the full 5-policy routing comparison, both modes on the SAME ttp trace (807 reqs, fresh vLLM/arm, dash0 8xH20). Confirms exp(c)'s prediction and finds something stronger: the dispatch mode FLIPS which policy wins. - thinktime helps every policy but helps LPWL most (TTFT p90 -40%, E2E mean -31% vs -3..-16% for the rest): tracets bursts punish prefill-spreading. - Ranking flip: tracets -> LPWL only ties unified_ab on TTFT p90 and is 3rd on E2E mean; thinktime -> LPWL is 1st on both (TTFT p90 -31%, best TPOT/balance, zero knobs) vs the tuned unified+A+B. - => benchmark agentic routing with thinktime; tracets' burst artifact erases LPWL's advantage. Caveat n=1: tracets ranking is run-sensitive (does not reproduce dash1 lpwl_5policy_600s.md), the thinktime advantage is the robust signal (appears in both environments). README + grouped-bar fig (figs/exp_d_policy_dispatch.png) + bench_report summaries in results/. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
BIN
v2/figs/exp_d_policy_dispatch.png
Normal file
BIN
v2/figs/exp_d_policy_dispatch.png
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 81 KiB |
Reference in New Issue
Block a user