The max/median ratio inverts the actual user-facing p90 ranking:
sticky: hotspot=2.73 but system e2e p90 = 34.6s (worst)
unified: hotspot=3.67 but system e2e p90 = 18.0s (best)
because sticky's median is also high (everyone slow) while unified
concentrates the damage on one worker and keeps the other 7 fast.
Any "imbalance" metric structurally punishes the affinity-then-escape
schemes that we actually want to advocate for.
Changes:
- analysis/characterization/render_window1_figures.py:
fig_b3_per_worker_ttft now annotates each subplot with
"median X.Xs · max Y.Ys" instead of "hotspot=Y.YY"; docstring
documents why we drop the ratio.
- figs/f4c_per_worker_ttft.png: regenerated with new titles.
- figs/f4c_apc_vs_hotspot_tradeoff.png: deleted. The scatter's y-axis
was the deprecated ratio; superseded by f4c per-worker bars + f6
e2e bars which together carry the same information honestly.
- PAPER_OUTLINE.md: C3, §3.3, §4.1 wording, §5 metric list, §8
conclusion — replace "hotspot index" mentions with
"worst-worker p90" or "(median, max) worker p90"; promote the
§3.3 methodology note to a top-level sub-finding ("hot pin
failure must be measured with per-worker absolute latency,
not normalized ratio").
- MEETING.md: §3.3 narrative reworded to lead with the (median, max)
pair directly; explicit one-line note on why the ratio is dropped.
Conceptual uses of "hot session" / "hot instance" / "hot pin" remain
unchanged — only the *metric* called hotspot index is retired.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
'capped' is not a routing policy — it's lmetric run on a separately
truncated trace (sessions capped to 8 turns via build_capped_trace.py).
Putting it alongside lmetric/load_only/sticky/unified in per-policy
comparison figures is misleading because the workload differs, not
the routing decision. Comparing apples to a different-trace orange
inflates/deflates apparent policy gaps for the wrong reasons.
Regenerated 4 figures with --exclude-policies capped on
analysis/characterization/render_window1_figures.py:
- f4a_apc_loss.png (APC bars)
- f4c_apc_vs_hotspot_tradeoff.png (APC vs hotspot scatter)
- f4c_per_worker_ttft.png (per-worker TTFT panel)
- f6_e2e_latency_bars.png (TTFT/TPOT/E2E bars)
Added --exclude-policies CLI flag to the renderer so this is a
reversible choice, not a permanent script mutation. capped data remains
in b3_policy_comparison.json and can be brought back in workload-
sensitivity sections (where it actually belongs) by omitting the flag.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Three CPU-only analysis pieces that turn raw Window 1 artifacts into
publishable numbers and figures.
scripts/compute_apc_upper_bound.py
Block-level trie walk over hash_ids to compute the theoretical APC
ceiling on a trace, decomposed into intra-session / any-session /
shared-prefix-only. Gives a fixed reference for what each routing
policy could *possibly* achieve. w600 result: 79.6% intra-session,
80.3% any-session, 0.1% shared-prefix.
analysis/characterization/b2_sweep_analysis.py (rewrite)
Previous version used joined_analysis.interference_index() which
labeled overlap = "any prefill in any other request during this
decode". With short-prompt decode load this is always true
(everyone's prefill overlaps everyone else's decode); n_overlap
was 239/240 even in the different-worker control.
New version labels overlap iff the decode's [t_first_token, t_finish]
intersects an actual large *injection* window, computed from the
cell's "prefill"-tagged metric rows. Different-worker control now
cleanly sits at idx ≈ 1.0, same-worker scales monotonically.
analysis/characterization/render_window1_figures.py
Renders 8 PNGs from the result JSONs: B3 latency / APC vs ceiling
/ APC vs hotspot scatter / per-worker TTFT / failure breakdown,
B2 TPOT and TTFT curves (overlap vs clean and idx), reuse
decomposition, KV footprint.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
