V2_DEEP_ANALYSIS §3.1 (execution_mode distribution) and §3.2 (path-level latency vs DP) had hand-typed tables with approximate latencies (e.g. "~1.0s") and required readers to mentally compare 5+ rows × 5 columns. Both sections now reference generated PNG figures derived directly from the v2 + DP metrics.jsonl files. §3.1 figure (v2_execution_mode_distribution.png): Horizontal bar chart, log x-axis. 4076 direct-to-D fast-path requests (green) dwarf the rest by ~30x; the long tail of slow / fallback / failure modes is visible at one glance. Counts and percentages annotated on each bar. §3.2 figure (v2_path_level_latency.png): Grouped bar chart, log y-axis. Per-path TTFT p50 / TTFT p99 / Lat p50 with exact numeric labels (no more "~1.0s" approximations). Sample counts annotated below each path. Quick visual reads: - KVC fast path TTFT p50 41ms vs DP 92ms (2.2x faster) - KVC reseed TTFT p99 5.12s vs DP 0.43s (12x slower) -- the cost - KVC no-d-capacity TTFT p99 7.65s (worst case) Bundled: - scripts/analysis/plot_v2_path_breakdown.py -- the script that generates both figures; rerunable when v2 data changes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
106 KiB
1800x900px
106 KiB
1800x900px