diff --git a/docs/harness-ablation/harness-vs-naive-20260616.md b/docs/harness-ablation/harness-vs-naive-20260616.md
index 3bde2d4..695aa99 100644
--- a/docs/harness-ablation/harness-vs-naive-20260616.md
+++ b/docs/harness-ablation/harness-vs-naive-20260616.md
@@ -65,8 +65,11 @@ wastes the budget).
   comparators, not validated peak-rates; the **direction/convergence** is the result.
 - The naive run was interrupted at trial-5 by a dash0 connectivity outage (not by the
   experiment). The conclusion is already unambiguous (5 trials, never raised TP, all
-  infeasible / one crash); a confirmatory naive-to-completion run on dash1 can remove
-  the asterisk.
+  infeasible / one crash). A confirmatory naive-to-completion was attempted on dash1
+  (shared cpfs, GPUs free) but **dash1 cannot reach the LLM gateway** (`Connection
+  refused` to the codex endpoint — dash0 has outbound access, dash1 does not), so the
+  LLM-driven loop only runs on dash0. The full-budget naive run can be completed when
+  dash0 is back; it will not change the conclusion.
 - LLM nondeterminism: a single run per arm. The harness arm's deterministic guided
   proposals (TP4 at iter 2) and validator veto are reproducible; the naive arm's exact
   path varies but its failure mode (wrong knob family, no TP) is the expected one.