Under the length-aware TTFT SLO (4s + L_in/8k), dense Qwen3.5-27B per-GPU throughput:
TP1=0.065, TP2=0.2925 (4.5x), TP4>=0.908 (>=14x, ceiling-saturated). TP1 is TPOT-bound
(one H20 can't decode a 27B under 50ms/token once batched); loosening TTFT didn't move
TP1, confirming TPOT is the binding constraint. Opposite of MoE 30B-A3B where TP1 was
best per-GPU. Validates the harness + length-aware SLO produce meaningful, non-saturated
measurements (TP1/TP2). TP4 saturated -> lower bound.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The reported trajectory validates the Stop-B mechanics only. TP2-DP2/TP4 saturated
the trace ceiling (best_sampling_u~0.98) so their per-GPU peak is underestimated, and
the run used the smoke regime (scale=0.1 + 512 cap). The TP1>TP2 ordering may be real
for the small-active MoE but this run cannot establish it; the 27B TP A/B is the valid
follow-up.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Real gpt-5.4 agentic loop on Qwen3-30B-A3B/H20 with Stop-A enabled. Validates both
Stop-B paths: search-high-saturation (validator-authorized immediate stop) and
multi-iteration convergence. The TP1 baseline stays the per-GPU incumbent (2.90
req/s/GPU); TP/DP scaling raises raw throughput but lowers per-GPU efficiency and is
correctly never adopted (no regression). The Phase-4 authority model is exercised
live: a premature LLM stop is vetoed (validator_did_not_authorize_stop), then a later
justified stop is honored after the veto budget. EP launch-failures handled as
hard-negative evidence. Auditable reason chains throughout.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
With the guard enabled the binary search recovers best sampling_u=0.078125
(rate 2.30 req/s), identical to the full-replay baseline. The guard fired on
exactly the one feasibility-knee probe (0.08594, re-measured full -> infeasible);
the other three probes truncated to ~45-50%. Net ~38% replay saved on the trial
with no peak-rate overestimate. Stop-A + boundary guard is safe to enable.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
CPU calibration (chat vs coder) reproduces the paper's C-slowest ordering and
shows C-convergence difficulty is driven by signal noise (low-reuse chat) not
reuse magnitude. GPU fidelity check on Qwen3-30B-A3B: truncating at the L-C-A
convergence prefix saves ~52% replay (tau_c=0.90) with 3/4 probe verdicts
preserved; the one mismatch is a boundary false-positive at the feasibility knee
(prefix 0.96 vs full 0.946), caused by second-half engine-state drift the offered
L-C-A cannot see. Argues for revisiting the SLO-boundary guard before enabling.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Add completed experiment results from dash0 runs after 2026-05-13:
- qwen27b chat 0-8k: harness +118.6% over no-harness (0.2696 vs 0.1233 req/s/GPU)
- qwen235b prefill TTFT 3s/6s/9s: harness +76.8% (0.3921 vs 0.2217 req/s/GPU)
Mark old 7-GPU and pre-5/13 docs as superseded. Update implementation
log with completed run status.