# workflow

1. read the paper
2. look for good ideas
3. look for flaws and categorize them
4. take some notes while reading
5. after 1 day to write review, generating insights and comments in the background and avoiding emotional

# structure

1. Summary
2. Recommendation
3. Strong points
4. Major weak points
5. Minor points

# A set of criteria

- originality
- insightfulness
- validation
- thoroughness
- importance of topic
- presentation
- clarity

---
# What I learned?

Some papers ...
are hard to follow, especially for reviewers who have no background in this topic.
are not focus on their main contribution, which can easily make reviewers feel loss.
lose a clear presentation about their insights to their methods, feel confused to follow the research path.



