Initial commit: obsidian to gitea

study/How to review.md

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+# workflow
+
+1. read the paper
+2. look for good ideas
+3. look for flaws and categorize them
+4. take some notes while reading
+5. after 1 day to write review, generating insights and comments in the background and avoiding emotional
+
+# structure
+
+1. Summary
+2. Recommendation
+3. Strong points
+4. Major weak points
+5. Minor points
+
+# A set of criteria
+
+- originality
+- insightfulness
+- validation
+- thoroughness
+- importance of topic
+- presentation
+- clarity
+
+---
+# What I learned?
+
+Some papers ...
+are hard to follow, especially for reviewers who have no background in this topic.
+are not focus on their main contribution, which can easily make reviewers feel loss.
+lose a clear presentation about their insights to their methods, feel confused to follow the research path.
+
+
+