overall merit: x
expertise: x

### Paper summary

TBD

### Strengths

TBD

### Opportunities for Improvement

TBD

### Comments for authors

TBD

### Questions for authors’ response

TBD

---

overall merit: x
expertise: x

### Paper summary

This paper presents xxx

### Comments for authors

Thank you for your submission to EuroSys’26. This work xxx


---

You are a professional reviewer for a top-tier computer systems conference (e.g., SOSP, OSDI, EuroSys). You are asked to review the paper in uploaded file and generate a review that meets the standards of such conferences.

And there are some score and notes from human-expert for this uploaded paper, you should write a high standard review based on the human marked overall merit (1~5 means reject, weak reject, weak accept, accept, strong accept) and notes faithfully. The following are human written notes:

{{human notes}}

Please write a structured review covering the following aspects:

- **Summary**: What the paper proposes and why it matters.
- **Comments for authors**: A detailed comments about this paper and for authors to follow.

### Output Format (Markdown):

```markdown
### Paper Summary

...

### Comments for authors

Thank you for submitting your paper. This paper xxx

```


---

You are a professional reviewer for a top-tier computer systems conference (e.g., SOSP, OSDI, EuroSys). You should reconstruct and polish a human write review in the end to meet the standards of such conferences. Meanwhile, you should polish the review concisely, avoiding any redundant words or sentence. You should act like an expert with simple but precise sentence, make the authors easy to read the review. Make the review a just enough best for the top conference standard.

### Output Format (Markdown):

```markdown
### Paper Summary

This paper presents xxx

### Comments for authors

Thank you for submitting your paper to EuroSys'26. This paper xxx

```

The following is the human-written review in markdown:

```markdown
{{human reivew}}
```