Re-ran the full comparison at --max-seq-len 8192 now that xserv handles it:
- OOM finding resolved — pool sized to available VRAM + vLLM-style host swap;
8192 runs with 0 swap events (swap is the overload safety net).
- Quality at parity with equal context: AIME 20.0% vs 20.0%, GSM8K 98% vs 96%.
- Speed unchanged relative to llama.cpp (~0.42-0.60x); TPOT is bandwidth-bound.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Refinements from end-to-end bring-up on the GPU host:
- Run each system start→suites→stop in sequence. Two BF16 8B models don't
co-reside on one 32GB GPU, and a resident idle engine would distort the
other's latency/throughput.
- Match generation mode: xserv hardcodes Qwen3 thinking off, so send
chat_template_kwargs={enable_thinking:false} to llama.cpp via a per-endpoint
extra_body. --enable-thinking opts back into thinking mode.
- Add tools/__init__.py so `python3 -m tools.bench.runner` resolves our package
instead of a site-packages `tools` (nvfuser ships one that shadowed it).
- Document offline-GPU-host workflow, thinking-match, and the xserv 8192 OOM
finding that the bench surfaced.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Vendor llama.cpp as a submodule pinned to b9371 and add a one-click
benchmark driver that compares xserv against it on identical workloads:
- setup-llama-cpp.sh: network-optional CUDA build (SM120); convert-to-gguf.sh
converts the same safetensors to BF16 GGUF for an apples-to-apples baseline.
- tools/bench/: black-box OpenAI-API driver measuring TTFT/TPOT/throughput
(single-stream + concurrent) and response quality on AIME 2025 + GSM8K.
- fetch_datasets.py pulls datasets to local JSON (GPU host has no network);
task loaders prefer the local JSON.
- sync-and-build.sh: `bench` subcommand transfers source + datasets to the
GPU host via tar-over-ssh (no rsync there), builds, and runs the suite.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
