Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
fb20178992 moe: sparse top-k decode — compute only routed experts (1.8x, beats llama TP=2)
Dense MoE replicated x across all 16 local experts and ran the full
batched GEMM, reading every expert's weights per token; the weighted
sum then discarded 12 of 16 results. Decode is memory-bound, so this
was ~8x wasted expert bytes — the entire decode gap vs llama.cpp.

New fused expert-indexed GEMVs (csrc/moe/moe_sparse.cu) read
topk_ids on-device (no host sync) and early-return block-uniformly
for experts other ranks own. FP8 runs W8A16 (activations stay BF16 —
tensor cores are irrelevant at M=1, and activation quantization error
disappears); MXFP4 runs W4A16. Per-expert bias + scale fused into the
GEMV epilogue; slot-indexed weighted sum skips (never multiplies)
unwritten non-local slots. Dense path retained for num_tokens > 8
(prefill) and via XSERV_DENSE_MOE=1 for A/B.

dash5 (RTX 5090), gpt-oss-20b FP8, TP=2: decode TPOT 13.9 -> 7.6 ms.
Warm-server vs llama.cpp MXFP4 TP=2: TPOT 7.19-7.32 vs 7.54-8.42 ms —
first config where xserv wins decode outright. GSM8K-100: 96% (dense
FP8: 91%). llama TP=1 (2.9 ms) remains ahead: next levers are decode
CUDA graphs, non-expert quantization, sparse prefill (docs/20).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-12 16:29:10 +08:00
Gahow Wang
4368e79695 model: fused GPU MoE kernel — eliminate CPU roundtrip
Replace the per-token CPU-routed MoE forward with an all-GPU path:

  1. moe_topk_softmax: GPU top-k + softmax (was CPU sort + softmax)
  2. moe_replicate: broadcast input to all local experts
  3. cublasGemmStridedBatchedEx: batched expert matmul (was per-expert cuBLAS)
  4. moe_weighted_sum: FP32-accumulated weighted sum on GPU (was GPU→CPU→F32→BF16→GPU)

Expert weights stored as contiguous 3D tensors for strided batched GEMM.
Zero CPU↔GPU transfers per MoE layer (was ~40 per token per layer).

Also: configurable geglu_alpha, LayerNorm bias auto-detect, unused-weight
diagnostic at load time.

GSM8K 30-problem: 11/30 → 23/30 (76.7%) vs llama.cpp 30/30 (100%).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-31 13:22:59 +08:00