Claude Code Agent e9ad1c4bc7 feat(experiments): E4 vs E1 results + p99 attribution figures
Headline: KVC v2 + load-floor + RDMA beats naive PD-disagg on
mean/p50/p90 by 30-65% (TTFT p50 31s vs 88s, lat p50 37s vs 93s,
wall-clock 64 min vs 88 min). Loses p99 by ~8% (TTFT 224 vs 207).

Wrote 4 figures (docs/figures/):
  e1_vs_e4_ttft_pdf.png         — bimodal E4 fast-path peak vs E1 single peak
  e1_vs_e4_latency_cdf.png      — CDF + log-survival showing tail crossover
  e4_path_latency.png           — per-execution-mode latency breakdown
  e1_vs_e4_p99_attribution.png  — what makes up E4's p99 tail

P99 tail attribution (this is the key finding):
  E4 p99 tail (n=65, TTFT ≥ 179.9s):
    fast-path direct-to-d        0 % (0/65)
    reseed paths                 5 % (3/65)
    fallback paths              88 % (57/65)
      large-append-session-cap  43 %  ← biggest culprit
      no-d-capacity             17 %
      large-append              14 %

Implication: D→P snapshot (designed to optimize reseed slow path)
even if fully working would touch ≤5% of the p99 tail. The real
bottleneck is *fallback chain* (admission retry + seeded-router
cold start), not reseed. Optimizing p99 needs work on fallback,
not more D→P plumbing.

Full analysis: docs/E4_VS_E1_RESULTS_ZH.md
2026-05-13 12:23:11 +08:00
2026-04-24 12:17:40 +00:00

Agentic PD Hybrid

这个项目是在 SGLang xPyD 上做一个最小实验框架,用来判断:

面向 agentic coding workload 的 session-aware / KV-cache-aware P/D routing能不能降低端到端延迟。

更完整但仍然简洁的说明见 docs/PROJECT_OVERVIEW.md

当前做了什么

  • 启动单机 SGLang P/D 栈。
  • 回放 Ali coding agent trace并记录 request-level metrics。
  • 支持 defaultstickykv-aware 路由策略。
  • 支持 pd-disaggregationkvcache-centricpd-colo 对比。
  • 支持小 append、多轮 session 的 micro-benchmark trace。
  • 维护了基于 SGLang v0.5.10 的本地 patch放在 third_party/sglang

环境

统一使用 uv

uv sync

默认模型路径:

~/models/Qwen/Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct

当前主要测试环境是单机 8 GPU约束是 prefill + decode <= 8

常用命令

生成小 append trace

uv run agentic-pd-hybrid make-small-append-trace \
  --output outputs/smoke-hotcap-30k-1k-256.jsonl \
  --session-count 4 \
  --turns-per-session 3 \
  --initial-input-length 30000 \
  --append-input-length 1000 \
  --output-length 256

跑 live benchmark

uv run agentic-pd-hybrid benchmark-live \
  --trace outputs/micro-serveable-varturn-30k-1k-256-20260424T0756Z.jsonl \
  --output-root outputs/live-serveable-varturn-30k-1k-256-hotcap \
  --mechanism kvcache-centric \
  --policy kv-aware \
  --kvcache-admission-mode worker \
  --prefill-workers 1 \
  --decode-workers 1 \
  --prefill-gpu-ids 0 \
  --decode-gpu-ids 1 \
  --transfer-backend mooncake \
  --target-duration-s 2000 \
  --session-sample-rate 1.0 \
  --min-turns 2 \
  --time-scale 1 \
  --concurrency-limit 1000

只回放并写 metrics

uv run agentic-pd-hybrid replay \
  --trace path/to/trace.jsonl \
  --policy kv-aware \
  --mechanism pd-disaggregation \
  --router-url http://127.0.0.1:8000 \
  --output outputs/replay.jsonl

输出

每次 replay/benchmark 会写:

  • request metricsrequest-metrics.jsonl
  • 汇总结果:request-metrics.jsonl.summary.json

重点看:

  • E2E latency
  • TTFT / TPOT
  • execution mode
  • cached tokens
  • KV transfer blocks
  • error

维护约定

  • 项目代码改动:feat: / fix: / docs:
  • SGLang 改动:feat(sglang): ... / fix(sglang): ...
  • third_party/sglang 的基线是 clean SGLang v0.5.10 snapshot。
  • 不提交 outputs/、日志、__pycache__、虚拟环境。
Description
No description provided
Readme 18 MiB
Languages
Python 100%