gahow/aituner
0
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Files
1880e859b50cfd0e3c67ea17f271ee24b2847dbc
aituner/docs/qwen27b-chat-0-8k-7day-compare/README.md

5.5 KiB
Raw Blame History

qwen27b-chat-0-8k-7day-compare

qwen3.5-27b chat trace, 0~8k input bucket, tuned-best vs baseline cross-day compare on internal vLLM (/usr/local/bin/vllm), compared by request_rate_per_gpu.

Setup

  • Hardware: dash1, 8x H20
  • Model: /home/admin/resource/model/464482ce/qwen3.5-27b/256k-0223-internal
  • Engine: internal vLLM
  • Baseline: empty patch over the study spec baseline, aligned to ~/run_qwen27b.sh TP=1, DP=1
  • Tuned best source: trial-0004 from dash0-qwen27b-tight-slo-10min-run9-chat-0-8k-codex-topology
  • Tuned best config:
    • tensor-parallel-size=2
    • data-parallel-size=1
  • Trace family: chat
  • Input bucket: 0 <= input_length <= 8192
  • Time range scanned: 2026-03-11 to 2026-03-17
  • Available windows in this slot: 7
    • chat_w20260311_1000
    • chat_w20260312_1000
    • chat_w20260313_1000
    • chat_w20260314_1000
    • chat_w20260315_1000
    • chat_w20260316_1000
    • chat_w20260317_1000
  • Window duration: 600s (10:00-10:10)
  • Request mode: chat
  • SLO:
    • pass target: 95%
    • TTFT <= 2000ms for <=4096 input tokens
    • TTFT <= 4000ms for <=32768 input tokens
    • TTFT <= 6000ms for >32768 input tokens
    • TPOT <= 50ms
  • Search:
    • binary search on sampling_u
    • max_probes = 6
  • Proposal model for tuned source: codex / gpt-5.4

Run assets

  • Compare root: /home/admin/cpfs/wjh/aituner/aituner/.aituner-compare/dash1-qwen27b-chat-0-8k-7days-compare
  • Summary: /home/admin/cpfs/wjh/aituner/aituner/.aituner-compare/dash1-qwen27b-chat-0-8k-7days-compare/summary.json
  • Report: /home/admin/cpfs/wjh/aituner/aituner/.aituner-compare/dash1-qwen27b-chat-0-8k-7days-compare/report.md
  • Compare spec: /home/admin/cpfs/wjh/aituner/aituner/.aituner-compare/specs/qwen27b_chat_0_8k_compare_dash1.json
  • Tuned study root: /home/admin/cpfs/wjh/aituner/aituner/.aituner-tight/dash0-qwen27b-tight-slo-10min-run9-chat-0-8k-codex-topology

Tuned-source result

  • Best trial: trial-0004
  • Best config:
    • tensor-parallel-size=2
    • data-parallel-size=1
  • Best sampling_u: 0.013061523438
  • Best request rate: 0.405 req/s
  • Best request rate per GPU: 0.2025 req/s/gpu
  • Best pass rate: 0.9629629629629629

Compared with the single-day baseline on chat_w20260311_1000:

  • trial-0001: 0.035 req/s, 0.035 req/s/gpu
  • trial-0004: 0.405 req/s, 0.2025 req/s/gpu
  • Raw throughput gain: 11.57x
  • Per-GPU throughput gain: 5.79x

12-trial summary

Trial Proposed config delta Result
trial-0001 baseline TP1/DP1 0.0350 req/s, 0.0350 req/s/gpu, feasible
trial-0002 DP=2 0.1233 req/s, 0.0617 req/s/gpu, feasible
trial-0003 DP=4 0.1567 req/s, 0.0392 req/s/gpu, feasible
trial-0004 TP=2, DP=1 0.4050 req/s, 0.2025 req/s/gpu, feasible, best
trial-0005 trial-0004 + max-num-batched-tokens=16384 infeasible
trial-0006 trial-0004 + max-num-seqs=24 infeasible
trial-0007 trial-0004 + max-num-batched-tokens=12288 infeasible
trial-0008 trial-0004 + block-size=32 infeasible
trial-0009 trial-0004 + gpu-memory-utilization=0.93 infeasible
trial-0010 trial-0004 + max-num-seqs=16, max-num-batched-tokens=6144 infeasible
trial-0011 trial-0004 + enable-prefix-caching=false infeasible
trial-0012 trial-0004 + block-size=128 infeasible

Aggregate result

  • Comparable wins: tuned 5, baseline 0
  • Incomparable windows: 2
  • Baseline mean request rate: 0.046 req/s
  • Tuned mean request rate: 0.4723809523809524 req/s
  • Baseline mean request rate per GPU: 0.046 req/s/gpu
  • Tuned mean request rate per GPU: 0.2361904761904762 req/s/gpu

Per-window result

Window Date Baseline req/s/gpu Tuned req/s/gpu Winner
chat_w20260311_1000 2026-03-11 0.035 0.21416666666666667 tuned
chat_w20260312_1000 2026-03-12 None 0.28 incomparable
chat_w20260313_1000 2026-03-13 0.03166666666666667 0.265 tuned
chat_w20260314_1000 2026-03-14 0.021666666666666667 0.24083333333333334 tuned
chat_w20260315_1000 2026-03-15 0.12166666666666667 0.23083333333333333 tuned
chat_w20260316_1000 2026-03-16 0.02 0.2275 tuned
chat_w20260317_1000 2026-03-17 None 0.195 incomparable

Key insights

  • The tuned-source tuning itself was simple and topology-driven. The winning patch is only TP1 -> TP2; later runtime-only tweaks all failed to beat it.
  • This compare does not support the conclusion that the tuned config lacks generalization. Across the full 7-day slice, tuned wins every directly comparable window.
  • The two incomparable days are not execution failures. Baseline completed probing but never found a single feasible sampling_u under the target SLO, while tuned still found feasible operating points.
  • The tuned TP=2, DP=1 shape is materially more robust than the TP=1, DP=1 baseline for this 0~8k chat bucket.
  • The weekend windows do not break the result. 2026-03-14 is another clear tuned win, and even on 2026-03-15, where baseline is relatively stronger than other days, tuned still wins by about 1.90x on req/s/gpu.
  • The throughput gap remains large even after normalizing by GPU count, so this is not just a raw-card-count artifact.

Recommendation

For qwen27b chat 0~8k, keep using the tuned TP=2, DP=1 serving shape as the default candidate over the TP=1, DP=1 baseline, and treat cross-day robustness as confirmed on the full 7-day window set.