Sets up the controlled use_harness ON-vs-OFF ablation on dense 27B: - both configs committed and validated on dash0 (differ only in use_harness + study_id), LLM auth + clean engine launch confirmed; - characterizes exactly what the harness toggles (Harnesses: prompt section with ranked bottleneck hypotheses + knob-family steering, deterministic guided/stop proposals, Stop-B validator/veto) vs naive; - substrate calibration from a real harness-ON run: at scale=0.2 the 180s elapsed cap fires correctly but TP1 is uniformly infeasible even at u=0.125 (pass=0, elapsed-capped) -> recommend scale 0.4-0.5 for a real baseline; comparability caveat documented. Honest status: full two-run sweep NOT completed in-session (~5-6 GPU-hours, sequential); GPUs left clean (all 0 MiB, no orphans; SIGTERM teardown re-validated). Includes a precise continuation recipe and the scripts/ablation_trajectory.py helper (validated against a prior store). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
9.0 KiB
Harness vs naive agentic tuner — controlled ablation on dense Qwen3.5-27B — 2026-06-16
Branch main. Goal: quantify the value of the paper's harness (domain-knowledge
knob-family guidance) by running the agentic tuning loop twice on the same
workload, identical in every respect except llm.use_harness.
Status: SET UP AND CALIBRATED; full two-run GPU sweep NOT completed in this session. The two ablation configs are committed and validated end-to-end on dash0 (LLM auth OK, engine launches clean, Stop-A/Stop-B machinery present). A substrate-calibration finding (below) was obtained from a real harness-ON run. The full sweep was not run to completion because each run is ~2–3 GPU-hours (8 trials × ~6-min engine warmup + multi-probe binary search) and the two runs are sequential (each may need 4 GPUs for TP4) — ~5–6 GPU-hours total, beyond this session. GPUs were left clean (all 0 MiB, no orphans). A precise continuation recipe is at the end.
What the ablation toggles (the harness mechanism, verified in code)
With use_harness=true vs false (src/aituner/llm.py, src/aituner/cli.py,
src/aituner/harness.py):
| Aspect | Harness ON | Naive OFF |
|---|---|---|
Prompt Harnesses: section |
present — ranked bottleneck hypotheses (_rank_bottleneck_hypotheses, weights TTFT/TPOT/queueing from probe failure counts + workload default) and per-knob-family use-when / procedure / guards with an active_now flag (e.g. TP family active_now when bottleneck ∈ {ttft_prefill, decode_tpot}) |
absent — only common preamble + study/SLO/trial-history JSON |
| Deterministic guided proposal | build_harness_guided_proposal can emit a deterministic first validation probe |
none — LLM proposes freely every iteration |
| Stop-B authority | _stop_authority: an LLM should_stop is honored only if the deterministic validator agrees (frontier closed + no high-value candidate); else vetoed (bounded, cli.py:350) |
LLM's own should_stop honored immediately (stop_authority is None ⇒ authorized=True) |
| Convergence guard | _convergence_guard: stop only when ≥3 completed trials are all within 2% of incumbent |
not applied |
The naive prompt still states TP/DP/EP are tunable and gives full context — so the only thing removed is the harness's bottleneck-diagnosis + knob-family steering (and the deterministic guided/stop scaffolding). That is exactly the paper's "naive agentic tuner."
Configs (committed, reproducible)
configs/examples/dash0_qwen27b_ablation_harness_on.json(study_id=dash0-qwen27b-ablation-harness-on,use_harness=true)configs/examples/dash0_qwen27b_ablation_naive_off.json(study_id=dash0-qwen27b-ablation-naive-off,use_harness=false)
The two files differ in exactly two keys (llm.use_harness, study_id) —
verified by diff of sorted JSON. Both validate on dash0 (codex/gpt-5.4 endpoint
resolves, base config inherited from dash0_qwen27b_stopB_loop.json).
Substrate (and the calibration finding)
The ablation measures the tuning process, not absolute peak-rate, so a faster
replay substrate is used (at replay_time_scale=1.0 a single TP4 trial took ~3 h —
stop-b-e2e-27b-20260616.md).
| knob | value | rationale |
|---|---|---|
trace.replay_time_scale |
0.2 | arrival_s = timestamp * time_scale (trace.py:223): same request set arrives in 1/5 the wall-clock → ~5× effective offered load. The brief's prescribed lever (compress time, not just cut the cap). |
trace.early_stop_max_elapsed_s |
180 (from 900) | the 600 s arrival window compresses to 120 s at scale 0.2, so the inherited 900 s wall cap was ~5× too large and let overloaded probes burn ~15 min each. Scaled proportionately to the compressed time axis. |
trace.early_stop_max_lag_s |
30 (from 120) | proportionate to the 120 s compressed window. |
search.high |
0.25 | sampling_u binary-search upper bound |
search.max_probes |
3 (from 5) | bound the binary-search step count per trial |
--max-trials |
8 | iteration budget |
| Stop-A | enabled (unchanged) | converged-prefix replay truncation on for both runs |
| SLO | length-aware TTFT (4 s + L_in/8k) + TPOT ≤ 50 ms | unchanged |
| GPUs | 2,3,4,5,6,7 |
GPUs 0/1 avoided |
Calibration finding (real harness-ON run, trial-0001 baseline TP1): the first
binary-search probe at sampling_u=0.125 measured pass_rate = 0.0 and
early-stopped on probe_elapsed_s>180.0 (probe_history.json). So:
- The 180 s elapsed cap works (cut the overloaded probe at 3 min, as intended).
- At scale 0.2, TP1 cannot serve even the lightest binary-search threshold of this 0–8k chat window — it is hopelessly TPOT/decode-bound under 5× compression (engine logs: 260 preemptions over 311 requests, 100% GPU util, ≥12 reqs always queued). The baseline incumbent therefore sits at/near the search floor, leaving large headroom for TP scaling — a clean ablation shape, but every TP1 probe runs the full 180 s cap (no feasible point to find faster).
Substrate recommendation for the rerun (carried into the continuation recipe):
scale 0.2 is too aggressive — it makes the whole TP1 family uniformly infeasible,
so the baseline is uninformative and each probe pays the full elapsed cap.
Use replay_time_scale=0.4–0.5 (window 240–300 s arrival) so TP1 registers a
real feasible baseline and feasible probes finish before the cap; keep the caps
proportionate (early_stop_max_elapsed_s = 900 × scale, early_stop_max_lag_s = 120 × scale).
Comparability caveat (applies to whatever scale is used). Compressed arrivals
mean the absolute request_rate_per_gpu is not comparable to the scale=1.0
ground-truth climb (TP1 0.123 → TP2 0.29 → TP4 1.00). The ablation reads
trajectory shape (which knob family each iteration tries; monotonic incumbent
climb; where each run stops) and relative per-topology ordering.
Expected contrast (hypothesis to be confirmed — do not treat as result)
From the committed mechanism and the scale=1.0 27B climb (stop-b-e2e-27b-20260616.md)
plus the older smoke-regime ablation (qwen27b-chat-0-8k-harness-fig18.md,
iters-to-best 4→2) and a prior 235B naive run inspected this session
(.aituner-prefill/...-noharness-minprompt-gpt54-20260514, which wandered into
TP4+EP4 and TP4+DP2 launch-failures, repeated max-num-seqs/mbt runtime fiddling,
and regressed at iters 6/8/9/11/12):
- Harness ON should diagnose TP1 as TPOT/decode-bound (the
tensor-parallel-sizefamilyactive_now) and steer to TP↑ early, climbing TP1→TP2→TP4 with a monotonic incumbent, then pivoting to runtime tuning on the winning family, and stop only when the Stop-B convergence guard authorizes it. - Naive OFF is expected to wander (runtime knobs, EP/duplicate/launch-failing
topologies) and possibly stop early on its own
should_stopwithout a validator veto.
This is the quantity the rerun must measure; it is not yet measured here.
Continuation recipe (to finish the sweep)
- On dash0, set
replay_time_scale=0.4(andearly_stop_max_elapsed_s=360,early_stop_max_lag_s=48) in both ablation configs; keepmax_probes=3,--max-trials 8, everything else identical. Re-verify the two configs differ only inuse_harness+study_id. export OPENAI_API_KEY=$(python3 -c "import json,pathlib;print(json.load(open(pathlib.Path.home()/'.codex/auth.json'))['OPENAI_API_KEY'])"); confirmcurl .../v1/models→ 200.- Run sequentially (GPUs 2–7 free between runs):
setsid env PYTHONPATH=src OPENAI_API_KEY=$OPENAI_API_KEY python3 -u -m aituner.cli study tune --spec <cfg> --store-root .aituner-ablation --max-trials 8 </dev/null >logs/<name>.log 2>&1 & - Extract trajectories with the committed helper:
python3 scripts/ablation_trajectory.py .aituner-ablation/<study_id>— it prints the iter → config → per_gpu → incumbent table and the proposal path (it distinguishesbaseline-*/proposal-*/harness-proposal-*/harness-stop-*, so metrics #2 and #5 fall out directly). - Fill the five comparison metrics: (1) iters-to-best, (2) proposal path,
(3) oscillation/regression, (4) wasted/infeasible/launch-failed trials,
(5) whether/when each run stops (harness Stop-B vs naive's own
should_stop).
Operational notes confirmed this session
- LLM auth path works (export
OPENAI_API_KEYfrom~/.codex/auth.json; 200 fromhttps://ai.prism.uno/v1/models). Both ON and OFF call the LLM. - GPUs 0/1 were clean (0 MiB) this session — the earlier leaked-memory orphans appear to have been reset; configs still pin GPUs 2–7.
- SIGTERM teardown fix validated again: killing
study tunetore down the engine + EngineCore workers cleanly, GPUs 2–7 returned to 0 MiB, no orphan. - Use
setsid+</dev/nullto fully detach the run from the (intermittently flaky) ssh session; pollstate.json/trials/*/probe_history.json. The CLI buffers little to stdout — per-trial signal is instate.json; per-request signal is in each trial'sengine.log.