37 lines
774 B
Markdown
37 lines
774 B
Markdown
# workflow
|
|
|
|
1. read the paper
|
|
2. look for good ideas
|
|
3. look for flaws and categorize them
|
|
4. take some notes while reading
|
|
5. after 1 day to write review, generating insights and comments in the background and avoiding emotional
|
|
|
|
# structure
|
|
|
|
1. Summary
|
|
2. Recommendation
|
|
3. Strong points
|
|
4. Major weak points
|
|
5. Minor points
|
|
|
|
# A set of criteria
|
|
|
|
- originality
|
|
- insightfulness
|
|
- validation
|
|
- thoroughness
|
|
- importance of topic
|
|
- presentation
|
|
- clarity
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
# What I learned?
|
|
|
|
Some papers ...
|
|
are hard to follow, especially for reviewers who have no background in this topic.
|
|
are not focus on their main contribution, which can easily make reviewers feel loss.
|
|
lose a clear presentation about their insights to their methods, feel confused to follow the research path.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|