e207523e21b6c4587ff522a3d4a8d7ca9b1d1e4b
Custom bandwidth-optimized GEMV kernel for M=1 BF16 decode, replacing cuBLAS which achieves only ~8% bandwidth utilization for tiny M=1 GEMMs. Kernel design (csrc/gemm/gemv.cu): - K-split tiled: TILE_N=128, TILE_K=256, Grid=(N/128, K/256)=512 blocks - High occupancy: 512 blocks / 170 SMs = ~3 blocks/SM - Coalesced memory access: adjacent threads read adjacent columns of W - Shared memory for x vector (avoids redundant global reads) - FP32 accumulation via atomicAdd (K-split partial sums) - Separate fp32→bf16 conversion kernel Integration: - matmul() auto-dispatches to custom GEMV when M==1 && dtype==BF16 - Batched decode (M>1) continues to use cuBLAS - Caching allocator provides FP32 temp buffer (pooled, no per-call malloc) Ablation results (dash5, RTX 5090, Qwen3-8B BF16): | Config | tok/s | vs HF (36) | vs roofline (112) | |--------|-------|-----------|-------------------| | Phase 14 (cuBLAS M=1) | 13.2 | 37% | 12% | | + Custom GEMV (M=1) | 46.6 | 130% | 42% | | Concurrent batch=4 | 28.2 | 78% | — | Single-request throughput now EXCEEDS HuggingFace transformers by 30%. The custom GEMV achieves ~42% of the theoretical roofline (vs 12% before). Note: concurrent batch=4 (28.2 tok/s) is slower than serial (46.6 tok/s) because the per-seq attention/reshape overhead in batched decode outweighs the cuBLAS M=4 benefit when the custom GEMV already handles M=1 efficiently. Engine should prefer serial decode when custom GEMV is available. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Description
No description provided
Languages
Rust
67.5%
Python
15.1%
Cuda
13.5%
Shell
3.9%